Are Claims Of Transparency All They Are Cracked Up To Be?

The current “buzzword” among leaders is “transparency.” Hardly a day goes by that a group leader (politician, manager, or administrator) doesn’t state that he values transparency and will provide full disclosure of his information and actions. This project tests experimentally whether or not leaders, when given a choice, actually reveal a preference for transparency. Our experiment is based on a theoretical model by Komai, Stegeman, and Hermalin (2007). Fifteen subjects are randomly assigned to five groups of three. Each group separately participates in an investment game with three possible return scenarios (high, average, and low) that are equally likely to happen. Investing in the low-return scenario is not profitable to either individual group members or the whole group. In the average-return scenario, group well-being is maximized if all the group members invest in the project, but full cooperation may not be achieved simply because the dominant strategy of the individuals is to free ride on others. In the high-return scenario full cooperation is also optimal for the group, but subjects may or may not coordinate on full cooperation because they may fail to coordinate their efforts with the others. We consider a leader-follower setting. Only one member of the group (the leader) observes the scenario. The leader moves before the rest of the group members and first decides whether or not to invest in the project. The leader then chooses between two information regimes: revealing his decision and the return scenario to the rest of the group or revealing his decision but not the return scenario. Absent any information provided by their leader, followers know only the possible return scenarios and their likelihoods. They do not know which scenario is assigned to their group. Given the leaders’ information choices and investment decisions, the relevant information will be conveyed to the followers. The followers then will separately and simultaneously decide whether or not to invest in the project (followers do not know anything about the different information regimes). This is realistic in many real-world circumstances because in many business or political environments the leaders have exclusive access to critical information and are in charge of deciding whether or not to reveal the details of their information and actions to their potential followers; in many circumstances it is practically difficult for the followers to verify the real information or the leaders’ actions.Transparency, leading by example, free-riding, cooperation.

A Conversation between Evelyne Grossman & Jacob Rogozinski & : Deleuze, reader of Artaud – Artaud, reader of Deleuze

A translation of a dialogue between Evelyne Grossman and Jacob Rogozinski on Artaud, Deleuze, and the status of the ego

La folie et Antonin Artaud

International audienc

Non c'è metalinguaggio : Lacan e Beckett

International audienc

Colloque international " La limite et l'illimité "

International audienc

Rencontres " littérature et psychanalyse ", Centre de Recherches en Littératures comparées

International audienc

Conférence au 1er Festival de l'Histoire de l'Art ( INHA)

International audienc

La chute des corps : le « coup de dés » de Jean-Luc Nancy

International audienceDe quoi parle Jean-Luc Nancy dans Corpus ? De l’invention du corps en Occident. L’Occident est donc une chute, un accident (de occidere : tomber). Il est non seulement le lieu où le soleil décline et se couche (l’Occident, le « Couchant du Temps », disait Hölderlin), mais comme par prédestination nominale, le lieu où s’est inventée cette chute infinie des corps : déclin, déclinaison, clinamen. C’est dans un matérialisme rigoureux que s’énonce ceci : le corps est d’abord élément d’une physique qui décline ses lois : pesanteur, attraction, gravitation. Gravitation mais aussi gravité des corps (le sévérité, la force de la loi) et encore, comme en sourdine, le corps gravide (« il est descendu en lui-même, sous la loi de cette gravité propre qui l’a poussé jusqu’en ce point où il se confond avec sa charge ») : corps engrossé et qui pèse (de gravidus, « chargé », dérivé de gravis, « lourd »), poids du corps enceint de lui-même, qui tombe de lui et se met au monde. Toute naissance est une chute, répètent les textes sacrés

Rencontres psychiatriques "Antonin Artaud, l'Homme et sa douleur"

International audienc